Verdict soon on World Trade Center third tower

Verdict soon on World Trade Center third tower

Maybe it is time there is a true investigation into the attacks.
The government spent more than $40 million for the Whitewater and Monica Lewinsky investigations but only $15 million for the 9/11 Commission.

It has cost $758 billion to cash the culprit and still you don’t know who did it ????LOL

www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUKQz-xm0is

None of remaining building(and they sustained more damage) never fell and they had big chunks out of them.
Look at the way it falls.
No building has ever fallen from fire and have burned for Alot longer of hours longer.
Is there realy anyone out there that believes the official version.

If it smells like a rat and looks like a rat it is normally a RAT

Well after reading this nothing surprises me. The whole event (although a tragedy) was suspicious from begininng to end. Maybe the third tower had some hidden secrets so it was better off demolished!!!!!!!

More inocent people will die from the dust than the actual accident itself.
Who do you blame for that????New Yorkers were told their air was safe to breathe after 9/11. It wasn’t. 700,000 people have added their names to a registry of those who believe they were exposed to toxic substances; the actual figure could be smaller, or it could run into millions - 10,000 of them so far have filed court claims. A Brooklyn study released last month found that cases of asthma there alone had increased 2.4 times since 11 September 2001. In the year following the attacks, firefighters developed sarcoidosis at five times the rate they had done so before; 26 firefighters who were working at Ground Zero within 72 hours of the attack sub sequently developed the disease, according to the findings of a study published last month in the medical journal Chest Physician.

The American College of Preventive Medicine, meanwhile, has expressed fears that deadly, malignant mesothelioma could develop in those exposed. Scores of rescue workers - 40 per cent of whom have no medical insurance - have already developed rare blood-cell cancers and thousands of firefighters have been treated for serious respiratory problems.

http://www.newstatesman.com/world-affairs/2007/06/york-air-death-city-breathe

Building 7 was used to house government secrets. That’s why it went down. The WTC towers were owned by a jewish business who insured them for multi-millions months before they came crashing down. Steel buildings don’t collapse due to fire, let alone implode in such a precise way. You’d have to be a brain-dead moron (or a US government operative) to believe they came crashing down because of fire. Let’s look at the entire history of the US actions since the WTC incident, and the motive is more than clear. Bush is just a puppet. Wolfowitz and co are to blame. It’s the power of nightmares.

A REAL QUESTION

Simple question to Conspiracy Theorists:

Who placed the explosives in WTC 1, 2 & WTC-7 ?
Interesting no one ( no workers) has come forward claiming they blew -up the buildings!

When were the explosives placed... It takes time to wire a building for a controlled demolition. Please explain when, how this was accomplished.

Real Questions, Real Answers

In response to who could have planted any explosives at WTC 1, 2 and 7, it had to be a controlled demolition team. Explain to the conspiracy theroists how did the buildings collaspses going straight down and no evidence of steel structures piled up at all three sites? Also, these buildings can be shut down from time to time on a weekend to perform “maintenance” at these sites. You need to check out this web site at http://911research.wtc7.net/index.html.That site will answer all of your questions on what happened on 9/11/2001.

Maybe....

the CIA put the explosives since they had an office there. Maybe the Office of the Secret Service did it since they had an office there. Maybe the FBI put the explosives in since they had an office there. Find out the truth.
Infowars.com

symmetry

>>normal building fires that were growing and spreading . . . .

That’s ridiculous. Fires are inherently asymmetrical and would never cause all columns to fail simultaneously. Even explosives experts have to work hard to achieve a vertical collapse like that. No fire, no matter how large, could have led to that.

listen to Richard Gage on National Radio

http://www.radiodujour.com/people/gage_richard

Compartmentalization explains why most didn't know

Q:Doesn’t the government-conspiracy view of the attack necessitate the involvement of large numbers of people?

A:Not in the execution of the attack. In fact there are plausible scenarios that involve fewer conspirators than the official story. High-ranking officials in the government have several things at their disposal that Osama bin Laden did not, including advanced weapons systems operable by computer, and a hierarchical and compartmentalized military command structure that allows complex operations to be hidden from all but a small group of operatives. Compartmentalization is commonly used, as described by former military intelligence Army Sgt. Adrienne Kinne, when she revealed that she saw secret US military documents listing the Palestine hotel in Iraq as a possible target on a Democracy Now program (May 13, 2008). She pointed out, “I had absolutely no idea what was going on in the rest of the military intelligence, the rest of our government. Everything is so compartmentalized that you don’t really know necessarily what the person next to you is doing, let alone in a different room in a different building in a different location."

bin Laden never bragged about taking down CIA HQ.

How come bin Laden never bragged about taking down the CIA / FBI / Secret Service offices that were in WTC7?

Singalong;
http://www.911truth.org/911truthmedia/WhichSideAreYouOn.mp3

Think

If the government apologists require everyone to believe that a mere 19 people living in a cave could pull of the most complex attack in history, then certainly it would take LESS than 19 US military operatives to pull of the attacks with much more money and logistical resources available to them than the 19 living in the cave. The obvious fact that World Trade Center Building 7 collapsed in a symmetrical fashion, and the top *20* floors imploded despite the fact that absolutely no fire was present on them, is direct evidence that something other than fire brought the building down.

CAUTION

Stay out of steel skyscrapers!! Think about it: Popcorn in a microwave could ignite a fire that could bring down the entire building!!

WTC7 Witnesses

Barry Jennings and Michael Hess both NYC employees heard multiple explosions on the 6th and 8th floors of building 7 while the twins were burning. The lobby of the bldg they stated was also destroyed. Temperatures in the range of 1300 degrees were found by a NASA plane flying above on 9/16/01. Molten metal was found in the basement of the bldg according to the fireman. The bldg fell straight down in 6 seconds or in free fall speed and did not spread to the neighboring bldg’s. Squids could be seen on the side of the building as the exterior walls pushed out before the building came down. The AC unit on the roof fell first, then the roof, and then the bldg. The Owner, Lucky Larry admitted the bldg was pulled. The steel in the bldg was carted off before being properly investigated. No steel framed bldg has ever collapsed due to fire. For the bldg to come down in the fashion it did, all of the steel columns would have had to shatter at the same instance. Could fire have done all of this alone?

Asbestos Exposure

Unfortunately, the number of deaths from 9/11 will go on and on. For example, the amount of asbestos in the towers and building 7 have never been quantified. It’s probably in the tons. Even exposure to a small number of microscopic fibers can theoretically cause or contribute to cancers like mesothelioma. How many emergency service personnel and bystanders were exposed to asbetsos in the hours, days, and weeks following 9/11?

More on asbestos and mesothelioma at www.survivingmesothelioma.com

funny

Why isn’t Bin Laden on the FBI’s most wanted list on their website for the atrocities on 9-11? Oh, that’s right, there’s no connection between him and the 9-11.

The real “kooks” are the ones who have continuously believed and repeated all of the lies coming out of this administration. My cat’s more intelligent than you.

“Yellow cake uranium”,
“Al Qaeda in Iraq”,
“We don’t torture”,
“I’m a uniter, not a divder”
“There’s no truth in the 9-11 conspiracy theories”
etc., etc.

That’s right. You “nut jobs” believed it.

On 9-17-2001 a reporter from CNN interviewed Ossama Bin Laden. That’s right. Our government in all its intelligence and military strength couldn’t find him, but some idiot reporter from CNN had no problem.

9-11 was a lie.

funny

Why isn’t Bin Laden on the FBI’s most wanted list on their website for the atrocities on 9-11? Oh, that’s right, there’s no connection between him and the 9-11.

The real “kooks” are the ones who have continuously believed and repeated all of the lies coming out of this administration. My cat’s more intelligent than you.

“Yellow cake uranium”,
“Al Qaeda in Iraq”,
“We don’t torture”,
“I’m a uniter, not a divder”
“There’s no truth in the 9-11 conspiracy theories”
etc., etc.

That’s right. You “nut jobs” believed it.

On 9-17-2001 a reporter from CNN interviewed Ossama Bin Laden. That’s right. Our government in all its intelligence and military strength couldn’t find him, but some idiot reporter from CNN had no problem.

9-11 was a lie.

Nutjobs

"Eye witness to the pentagon attack."

Nobody said ANYTHING about that. Is this another straw man tactic?

For you retards that seem to not be able to get it the first time, I repeat:

Why isn’t Bin Laden on the FBI’s most wanted list on their website for the atrocities on 9-11? Oh, that’s right, there’s no connection between him and the 9-11. The real “kooks” are the ones who have continuously believed and repeated all of the lies coming out of this administration. My cat’s more intelligent than you. “Yellow cake uranium”, “Al Qaeda in Iraq”, “We don’t torture”, “I’m a uniter, not a divder”, “There’s no truth in the 9-11 conspiracy theories” etc., etc. That’s right. You “nut jobs” believed it. On 9-17-2001 a reporter from CNN interviewed Ossama Bin Laden. That’s right. Our government in all its intelligence and military strength couldn’t find him, but some idiot reporter from CNN had no problem. 9-11 was a lie.

Oh look, it’s still in the archives:
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/

Conservatives question 9/11

Video: 9/11 Commissioner Kean says the Commission “was set up to fail."
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Tzrv-e37Es8
.....
“We to this day don’t know why NORAD told us what they told us," said Thomas H. Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. “It was just so far from the truth. . . . It’s one of those loose ends that never got tied."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006080101300.html
.....
9/11 Comissioners: The White House and CIA “obstructed our investigation”.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/opinion/02kean.html
.....
Leading Conservatives: 9/11 Cover-Up
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/03/911-and-right.html
.....
Bush was spying on Americans over six months beFORE 9/11
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/12/AR2007101202485.html
-and- http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/10/qwest-ceo-not-a.html
.....
Database of mainstream news articles concerning 9/11
http://complete911timeline.org/project.jsp?project=911_project
.....
Military Report: Secretly 'Recruit or Hire Bloggers'
This 2006 report for the Joint Special Operations University, “Blogs and Military Information Strategy," offers a third approach — co-opting bloggers, or even putting them on the payroll. “Hiring a block of bloggers to verbally attack a specific person or promote a specific message may be worth considering,"
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/03/report-recruit.html
.....
Singalong!
http://newjersey.indymedia.org/usermedia/audio/8/The_John_Kasper_Band_-_Conspiracy_of_Silence.mp3

nice pics, retard

Take a good look at these pics and remember: you’re government created al Qaeda.

On 9-17-2001 a reporter from CNN interviewed Ossama Bin Laden. Our government in all its intelligence and military strength couldn’t find him, but some idiot reporter from CNN had no problem. 9-11 was a lie.

still, smarter than you

Yukon,

You think that supporting the lies and propaganda spewed forth by the government is being “patriotic”? I refuse to support any flavor of fascism. As I said before, my cat’s smarter than you.

The truth about your “al Qaeda”:

http://www.rense.com/general61/myths.htm

Again, for those that are really slow (like Yukon):

On 9-17-2001 a reporter from CNN interviewed Ossama Bin Laden. Our government in all its intelligence and military strength couldn’t find him, but some idiot reporter from CNN had no problem. 9-11 was a lie.

again

On 9-17-2001 a reporter from CNN interviewed Ossama Bin Laden. Our government in all its intelligence and military strength couldn’t find him, but some idiot reporter from CNN had no problem.

Here’s the link. Go ahead, debunk that. Please.

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/

9-11 was a lie.

and?

Yukon,

The government is complicit and/or behind 9-11. Thank you for helping prove my point.

Sarcoidosis

The Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research offers patients a reputable resource for up-to-date information on their disease. For more information please visit us online at www.stopsarcoidosis.org. Request our free brochure 'Sarcoidosis & the Body' to learn more about symptoms, diagnosis and treatment.

Verdict’s in...
:cool:
9/11 third tower mystery 'solved'
Friday, 4 July 2008 - Fire caused the collapse of the third tower at the World Trade Center, a final report is expected to find.

]
The 47-storey third tower, known as Tower Seven, collapsed seven hours after the twin towers. Investigators are expected to say ordinary fires on several different floors caused the collapse. Conspiracy theorists have argued that the third tower was brought down in a controlled demolition. Unlike the twin towers, Tower Seven was not hit by a plane.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology, based near Washington DC, is expected to conclude in its long-awaited report this month that ordinary fires caused the building to collapse. That would make it the first and only steel skyscraper in the world to collapse because of fire. See World Trade Center 7’s location and structure

The National Institute of Standards and Technology’s lead investigator, Dr Shyam Sunder, spoke to BBC Two’s “The Conspiracy Files”: “Our working hypothesis now actually suggests that it was normal building fires that were growing and spreading throughout the multiple floors that may have caused the ultimate collapse of the buildings."

[url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/americas/7485331.stm:
'Smoking gun'[/url]

Unregistered

Unregistered;89710:
None of remaining building(and they sustained more damage) never fell and they had big chunks out of them.
Look at the way it falls.
No building has ever fallen from fire and have burned for Alot longer of hours longer.
Is there realy anyone out there that believes the official version.

The other buildings that suffered structural damage did not sustain unsuppressed fires. Why are you so ignorant?

Investigation needed on 9/11

When the Bush gang leaves the White House the investigators should move in. Too many suspicious things happened on their watch. We need answers not stonewalling. We need to know what went on.

~galljdaj-

~galljdaj-;89742:
Building 7 was used to house government secrets. That’s why it went down. The WTC towers were owned by a jewish business who insured them for multi-millions months before they came crashing down. Steel buildings don’t collapse due to fire, let alone implode in such a precise way. You’d have to be a brain-dead moron (or a US government operative) to believe they came crashing down because of fire. Let’s look at the entire history of the US actions since the WTC incident, and the motive is more than clear. Bush is just a puppet. Wolfowitz and co are to blame. It’s the power of nightmares.

Why have you been allowed unsupervised access to a computer at the mental asylum? It is hard to believe any normal human being could be soooo incredibly DUMB!

You should seek special treatment of your “nightmares”.

PS When are you wackjobs going to present your evidence to the “world court” for prosecution? ROTFLOLAY!

ngiNERD,All

EngiNERD;89763:
Simple question to Conspiracy Theorists:

Who placed the explosives in WTC 1, 2 & WTC-7 ?
Interesting no one ( no workers) has come forward claiming they blew -up the buildings!

When were the explosives placed... It takes time to wire a building for a controlled demolition. Please explain when, how this was accomplished.

One other question for the conspiracy kooks, “Why didn’t the bomb and explosive detecting dogs ever find any sign in the WTC?"

the 7:16 poster is a coward liar and a name theif...

... , so what kind of lil person does such a thing? Pitty him like a wart?

Honor him by flushing the toilet?

What kind of great american hero, did his mama raise, naw wrong word, spawn!

planetrock

planetrock;89764:
In response to who could have planted any explosives at WTC 1, 2 and 7, it had to be a controlled demolition team. Explain to the conspiracy theroists how did the buildings collaspses going straight down and no evidence of steel structures piled up at all three sites? Also, these buildings can be shut down from time to time on a weekend to perform “maintenance” at these sites. You need to check out this web site at http://911research.wtc7.net/index.html.That site will answer all of your questions on what happened on 9/11/2001.

You need to get a basic knowledge of physics. Are you familiar with gravity?

Democracy Now

Reader911;89833:
Q:Doesn’t the government-conspiracy view of the attack necessitate the involvement of large numbers of people?

A:Not in the execution of the attack. In fact there are plausible scenarios that involve fewer conspirators than the official story. High-ranking officials in the government have several things at their disposal that Osama bin Laden did not, including advanced weapons systems operable by computer, and a hierarchical and compartmentalized military command structure that allows complex operations to be hidden from all but a small group of operatives. Compartmentalization is commonly used, as described by former military intelligence Army Sgt. Adrienne Kinne, when she revealed that she saw secret US military documents listing the Palestine hotel in Iraq as a possible target on a Democracy Now program (May 13, 2008). She pointed out, “I had absolutely no idea what was going on in the rest of the military intelligence, the rest of our government. Everything is so compartmentalized that you don’t really know necessarily what the person next to you is doing, let alone in a different room in a different building in a different location.“

“on a Democracy Now program”

Yeah, you are sure to get the unbiased truth there! ROTFLOLAY!

19 people living in a cave

Unregistered;89849:
If the government apologists require everyone to believe that a mere 19 people living in a cave could pull of the most complex attack in history, then certainly it would take LESS than 19 US military operatives to pull of the attacks with much more money and logistical resources available to them than the 19 living in the cave. The obvious fact that World Trade Center Building 7 collapsed in a symmetrical fashion, and the top *20* floors imploded despite the fact that absolutely no fire was present on them, is direct evidence that something other than fire brought the building down.

You conspiracy theorists are laughable. You are the ones who appear to be cave dwellers. No one else could possibly be as ignorant.

Boots...LOL

Boots;90025:
Barry Jennings and Michael Hess both NYC employees heard multiple explosions on the 6th and 8th floors of building 7 while the twins were burning. The lobby of the bldg they stated was also destroyed. Temperatures in the range of 1300 degrees were found by a NASA plane flying above on 9/16/01. Molten metal was found in the basement of the bldg according to the fireman. The bldg fell straight down in 6 seconds or in free fall speed and did not spread to the neighboring bldg’s. Squids could be seen on the side of the building as the exterior walls pushed out before the building came down. The AC unit on the roof fell first, then the roof, and then the bldg. The Owner, Lucky Larry admitted the bldg was pulled. The steel in the bldg was carted off before being properly investigated. No steel framed bldg has ever collapsed due to fire. For the bldg to come down in the fashion it did, all of the steel columns would have had to shatter at the same instance. Could fire have done all of this alone?

Hey Boots, where did you get your talking points, from Loose Change or Alex Jones? It is quite apparent you don’t know shiite and haven’t researched anything on your own.


Jun 25, 2008 ... Alex Jones New 9/11 Developments - Barry Jennings LOLAY!

Michael Hess Videos - Watch Video about Michael Hess on MefeediaWatch michael hess videos. Find the most recent michael hess video and clips

More 9/11 whores looking for $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Bob411....kook

Bob411;90266:
Why isn’t Bin Laden on the FBI’s most wanted list on their website for the atrocities on 9-11? Oh, that’s right, there’s no connection between him and the 9-11.

The real “kooks” are the ones who have continuously believed and repeated all of the lies coming out of this administration. My cat’s more intelligent than you.

“Yellow cake uranium”,
“Al Qaeda in Iraq”,
“We don’t torture”,
“I’m a uniter, not a divder”
“There’s no truth in the 9-11 conspiracy theories”
etc., etc.

That’s right. You “nut jobs” believed it.

On 9-17-2001 a reporter from CNN interviewed Ossama Bin Laden. That’s right. Our government in all its intelligence and military strength couldn’t find him, but some idiot reporter from CNN had no problem.

9-11 was a lie.

Pull your head out of your colon before you asphyxiate. Yeah, there was no yellowcake. /s Only 550 metric tons.

Eye witness to the pentagon attack.

Bob411;90266:
Why isn’t Bin Laden on the FBI’s most wanted list on their website for the atrocities on 9-11? Oh, that’s right, there’s no connection between him and the 9-11.

The real “kooks” are the ones who have continuously believed and repeated all of the lies coming out of this administration. My cat’s more intelligent than you.

“Yellow cake uranium”,
“Al Qaeda in Iraq”,
“We don’t torture”,
“I’m a uniter, not a divder”
“There’s no truth in the 9-11 conspiracy theories”
etc., etc.

That’s right. You “nut jobs” believed it.

On 9-17-2001 a reporter from CNN interviewed Ossama Bin Laden. That’s right. Our government in all its intelligence and military strength couldn’t find him, but some idiot reporter from CNN had no problem.

9-11 was a lie.

I had the good fortune to talk to two people that saw the plane hit the Pentagon they work across the street and physically saw it hit.
It was a plane full of people not a missile or a small plane!
Kinda ruins the enite conspiracy theory nonsense.

You can't talk about one without the other

Bob411;90452:
“Eye witness to the pentagon attack."

Nobody said ANYTHING about that. Is this another straw man tactic?

For you retards that seem to not be able to get it the first time, I repeat:

Why isn’t Bin Laden on the FBI’s most wanted list on their website for the atrocities on 9-11? Oh, that’s right, there’s no connection between him and the 9-11. The real “kooks” are the ones who have continuously believed and repeated all of the lies coming out of this administration. My cat’s more intelligent than you. “Yellow cake uranium”, “Al Qaeda in Iraq”, “We don’t torture”, “I’m a uniter, not a divder”, “There’s no truth in the 9-11 conspiracy theories” etc., etc. That’s right. You “nut jobs” believed it. On 9-17-2001 a reporter from CNN interviewed Ossama Bin Laden. That’s right. Our government in all its intelligence and military strength couldn’t find him, but some idiot reporter from CNN had no problem. 9-11 was a lie.

Oh look, it’s still in the archives:
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/

Al l you nutter conspiracy theorists are all the same with same weak milk toast arguments!
One part of the puzzle falls off the rest will as well.
9-11 has parts that are a lie in that your correct but our government had nothing more then a passing knowledge something was going to happen.
They then sat on it with the feeling nothing bad will ever happen on US soil.

To answer your question Osama has a huge ego he of course loves the attention the Red Crescent News Network afforded him!

The real operator of 9-11 was of course Pakistan and the ISI division supporting the old Muslim Brotherhood who has morphed into the Taliban and the Al Qaeda group.

Bob411=KOOK

Bob411;90452:
“Eye witness to the pentagon attack."

Nobody said ANYTHING about that. Is this another straw man tactic?

For you retards that seem to not be able to get it the first time, I repeat:

Why isn’t Bin Laden on the FBI’s most wanted list on their website for the atrocities on 9-11? Oh, that’s right, there’s no connection between him and the 9-11. The real “kooks” are the ones who have continuously believed and repeated all of the lies coming out of this administration. My cat’s more intelligent than you. “Yellow cake uranium”, “Al Qaeda in Iraq”, “We don’t torture”, “I’m a uniter, not a divder”, “There’s no truth in the 9-11 conspiracy theories” etc., etc. That’s right. You “nut jobs” believed it. On 9-17-2001 a reporter from CNN interviewed Ossama Bin Laden. That’s right. Our government in all its intelligence and military strength couldn’t find him, but some idiot reporter from CNN had no problem. 9-11 was a lie.

Oh look, it’s still in the archives:
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/

Your cat is undoubtedly more intelligent than you! 550 metric tons of yellowcake, pinhead. Are you claiming there is no al Qaeda in Iraq, kook?

You mean when OBL was presented as a gift to Clinton, he refused to take him?

Oh look, this is still in the archives, dumbass!

Bob411

Bob411;90499:
Take a good look at these pics and remember: you’re government created al Qaeda.

On 9-17-2001 a reporter from CNN interviewed Ossama Bin Laden. Our government in all its intelligence and military strength couldn’t find him, but some idiot reporter from CNN had no problem. 9-11 was a lie.

Pull your head out of your colon, dumbass. Is your stupidity congenital or self-inflicted?

OBL was offered to Bill Clinton and he refused to take him. What do you make of that dumbass?

Again You Don't Have A Freaking Clue.

Bob411;90499:
Take a good look at these pics and remember: you’re government created al Qaeda.

On 9-17-2001 a reporter from CNN interviewed Ossama Bin Laden. Our government in all its intelligence and military strength couldn’t find him, but some idiot reporter from CNN had no problem. 9-11 was a lie.

Yes the CIA had indirect control of Taliban assets when they fought Russia to a standstill using our ground to air missiles!
Once Russia Ran with it’s tail between it’s legs we defunded the ISI division.
That happened looooooooong before the Al Qaeda group formed twenty years before 9-11.
Get your facts straight.

It sounds legit...

Let’s take it from Yukon. He’s sure of his opinion without the use of critical thinking! He mastered the art of eloquent speaking in his 7th grade schoolyard, and needed no further education. Bill O’Reilly for President!

Andy1982

Andy1982;90541:
Let’s take it from Yukon. He’s sure of his opinion without the use of critical thinking! He mastered the art of eloquent speaking in his 7th grade schoolyard, and needed no further education. Bill O’Reilly for President!

OBL was offered to Bill Clinton and he refused to take him. What do you make of that dumbass?

Smart?

Bob411;90614:
Yukon,

You think that supporting the lies and propaganda spewed forth by the government is being “patriotic”? I refuse to support any flavor of fascism. As I said before, my cat’s smarter than you.

The truth about your “al Qaeda”:

http://www.rense.com/general61/myths.htm

Again, for those that are really slow (like Yukon):

On 9-17-2001 a reporter from CNN interviewed Ossama Bin Laden. Our government in all its intelligence and military strength couldn’t find him, but some idiot reporter from CNN had no problem. 9-11 was a lie.

Your about as smart as a turkey.
You can’t even make a cogent point without using talking points from the whacked out truther sites.
Damn near everything you have posted has been disproven.
Rense is a wrench who is once again selling a belief lacking in FACT
do you understand the word fact verses conjecture and speculation.
You live in a fantasy world of scifi and unreality.

Shhh the goberment is listening shhhh post under an anyonmlus name maybe the gman won’t track you down. shhhhh.
Guess what they have your ip address the black helocopter will be hovering around you house from now on!

Bob411

Bob411;90641:
On 9-17-2001 a reporter from CNN interviewed Ossama Bin Laden. Our government in all its intelligence and military strength couldn’t find him, but some idiot reporter from CNN had no problem.

Here’s the link. Go ahead, debunk that. Please.

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/

9-11 was a lie.

Cat got your tongue, Bob? OBL was offered to Bill Clinton and he refused to take him. What do you make of that dumbass Or is your head so far up your ass, you can’t see the question?

Bob411=twoofer kook

Bob411;90646:
Yukon,

The government is complicit and/or behind 9-11. Thank you for helping prove my point.

The only point you have is on your head.

Or

Bob411;90646:
Yukon,

The government is complicit and/or behind 9-11. Thank you for helping prove my point.

The government is inept and corrupt!
Yep yep yep I belive the government is inept corrupt and incapable of getting out of it’s own way!
What has the government ever done right?
Thanks for proving how wrong you are.

Verdict soon on World Trade Center third tower

NIST will likely form a conclusion based on no empirical evidence. The report will be story with little or no foundation on fact. It will fit nicely with the current gee-whiz narrative that a dumbed-down public has unfortunately been fed.

Simply, there is no way that NIST can collapse a steel structure symmetrically into itself using only fire. The probability of unified structured failure from random fires and damage from falling (WTC) debris is virtually nil. Yet, NIST will pedal nonsense, overlook facts and common sense, and publish their “conclusion."

They will not engage real scientist and engineers/architects with valid questions, but will ignore substantive scientific questions and evidence. Just wait ....

AHHHH!!!!!!

I am becoming ill with paranoia reading some of this drivel. Delusions of persecution are everywhere! COOKOO COOKOO